Sure, this will make things easier to regulate from a national level. Sure, it will make it easier for automakers to comply. But in reality, it is only stalling the process.
Washington Post reports: The decision set in motion a legal battle that EPA's lawyers expect to lose and demonstrated the Bush administration's determination to oppose any mandatory measures specifically targeted at curbing global warming pollution. A total of 18 states, representing 45 percent of the nation's auto market, have either adopted or pledged to implement California's proposed tailpipe emissions rules, which seek to cut vehicles' greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent between 2009 and 2016.
In a telephone news conference last night, [EPA Administrator Stephen L.] Johnson said he thinks that the higher fuel-economy standards and increased renewable-fuel requirements in the energy bill President Bush signed into law yesterday will do more to address global warming than imposing tailpipe rules in individual states.
"The Bush administration is moving forward with a clear national solution, not a confusing patchwork of state rules, to reduce America's climate footprint from vehicles," Johnson said. "President Bush and Congress have set the bar high, and, when fully implemented, our federal fuel-economy standard will achieve significant benefits by applying to all 50 states."
Congress passed an emissions regulation Tuesday aimed at reducing gasoline consumption (read about it... it's a good article), but California's rules would target total greenhouse gas emissions, including auto air conditioning units and the so-called "carbon-footprint" of cars.
California standards are seeking a miles-per-gallon average of 33.8 by 2016 in every vehicle operating within the state. The federal energy law is slightly more lax, requiring an average fuel economy of 35 mpg by 2020.
You can anticipate a battle like many California laws that have come before (cough, cough: legal marijuana) over states rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment